|




















|


Agassiz
Self-Assessment Summary
In the 2000/2001 school year, each
Boston Public School was asked to assess their progress
in implementing each of the Six Essentials of the Whole
School Improvement Plan. We determined our progress in
implementation of each of the essentials using the
following phases of implementation in the Whole School
Improvement Continuum:
Our self assessment in each of the
6 areas of Whole School Improvement is as
follows:
What is our
progress in implementing Essential 1: Identifying an
Instructional Focus?
The following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
Literacy
- Scaled up the implementation of SFA. Teachers are
now comfortable with the SFA approach to literacy.
Classrooms are environmentally in step with
program.
- Students and staff have incorporated SFA lingo
into their own.
- SFA Implementation reports show Agassiz improving
each year since '97-'98.
- School uses feedback from Literacy Coordinator and
SFA staff reports to improve the implementation of the
program.
- SFA reduced prototype of special needs students
across the board.
- Teachers act as peer coaches and facilitators of
component level meetings.
- A half-time Literacy Specialist will begin working
with the 3rd grade students and teachers to address
the Level 1 students.
Math
- The school acquired the services of a full-time
Math Specialist to work with primarily 3rd grade Level
1 students and their teachers. This is part of the
BPS's Transition Program.
- The Agassiz began to work with Mahesh Sharma
during the '99-'00 school year. The primary emphasis
was to support teachers and students in Grade 4 to be
better prepared for the math portion of the MCAS.
- Dr. Sharma's work extended to the rest of the
faculty via two workshops aimed at raising the
teachers' awareness of the language of
mathematics.
ILT (Instructional
Leadership Team)
- The ILT continued to struggle in securing full
grade level representation but it did manage to
develop into a much more effective leadership body
from the previous year.
- Coaching for the ILT was minimal due to work
commitments on the coach's side. Guidance was provided
to prepare us for the upcoming IDR process.
- The ILT dealt with instructional issues ranging
from providing a pedagogical basis in the preparation
of the school's schedule to monitoring the progress of
the SFA program.
Our
goals
for moving to the
next phase
are:
Literacy
- We have identified a set of goals based on the SFA
Implementation Visit reports that deal with each
component level not having any "1"'s and achieving
"3"'s in areas that have remained at a status quo for
two years.(The SFA rubric goes from 0-3).
- School-wide goals will be posted publicly.
- Each teacher will identify a set of individual
goals linked to the over all SFA goals of the
school.
- The SFA Facilitator and the Principal will monitor
the progress of meeting the established goals using
the SFA eight-week schedule.
- SFA teachers will use SFA data to assess students'
progress on a continuous basis(4,6 & 8 week
checkpoints.)
- All SFA teachers will receive training in the use
and management of SFA data during the August, SFA
training.
- Implementation of Cooperative Learning strategies
during the teaching of math in all homerooms. This
would be an extension of an SFA strategy. This
implementation is scheduled for September, 2000.
- The Literacy Specialist will oversee the Reading
Excellence assessment program in grades K-3 and
provide guidance to an writing initiative
Math
- The Agassiz will be a Level II school as part of
BPS' Math Plan.
- The Math Leadership Team will consist of
representatives of grades K-5, the school's Math
Specialist and the Principal.
- The Principal will join the MLT in the DMI
training instead of the Lenses on Learning
training.
- Dr. Sharma has been contracted to work with the
MLT to develop and provide math professional
development to all staff members during the 2000-2001
school year.
- Dr. Sharma will also be developing workshops for
parents.
- The Math Specialist will continue to work with the
Level 1 3rd grade students and their teachers via
modeling lessons, providing tutorial and
before/after-school programs and parent
workshops.
ILT (Instructional
Leadership Team)
- We will be hiring a Content Coach whose main
responsibilities will be to: 1. Provide a focus to the
ILT's agenda, 2. Develop the ILT's members leadership
capacity and 3. Implement an LASW protocol for all
Instructional Teams.
- All grade levels will be represented in the
ILT.
- We will establish a standing co-chair position and
institute rotating teacher facilitators for each
meeting.
- The ILT will monitor the LASW sessions of each
grade level through monthly reports generated at those
sessions.
- Establish a meeting calendar for the whole school
year.
- Post agendas, minutes and meeting schedule in the
intranet.
What is our
progress in implementing Essential 2: Looking at Student
and Data in Relation to the Citywide Learning
Standards?
The following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
- There is a great deal of variety in the protocols
being used in Looking at Student Work (LASW).
- There is inconsistency in using the time allocated
for Looking at Student Work.
- Some grade levels are Looking at Student Work
effectively, i.e. using the information to
inform/improve instruction.
- The time in reaching consensus in scoring
students' work has decreased which indicates a deeper
understanding and knowledge of the rubrics.
- We did not have a coach to guide us through this
process in the last two years.
Our
goals
for moving to the
next phase
are:
- The school has made a commitment to hire a content
coach for the upcoming school year.
- The school's SSC and the ILT supported a faculty
vote to dedicate the 18 hours of professional
development to LASW.
- There will be a 90 minute LASW monthly session
scheduled every month.
- The coach will provide LASW protocol training to
all teachers via the Instructional Teams.
- The IT's will report their findings through LASW
to the ILT on a monthly basis. These findings could
become the basis for professional development
activities.
- The LASW sessions will look at math & writing
student work.
- P&D sessions controlled by the administration
will be used for LASW training and for LASW sessions
on a weekly basis. IT's will maintain a record of
their meetings.
- Administrators assigned to the IT's will provide
support/guidance to the LASW work of the teams.
- Grade level after-school LASW sessions' schedules
will be posted on the intranet.
- The school will use data gathered from SFA,
Reading Excellence assessments, formative math
assessments as well as from all summative assessments
to reflect on how they inform our instruction of
students.
What is our
progress in implementing Essential 3: Creating a Targeted
Professional Development Plan to Improve Instruction in
Core Subjects?
The
following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
Literacy
- Success For All professional development is an
on-going activity throughout the school year.
- Staff from the Success For All Foundation will
teach summer workshops.
- Component level meetings are held every two weeks
during the school year. The SFA Facilitator leads
these workshops. This year we will have two Lead
Teachers facilitating two of the three
components.
- Nine (9) teachers attended the SFA national
conference in Miami and returned to lead discussions
and share latest developments in implementing the SFA
model.
- SFA implementation visits (Fall and Spring)
provided staff with feedback on current status and
next steps to further improve the implementation of
the model.
- Provided training on writing via The Landmark
School to support writing across the curriculum in all
grades. Not a successful activity.
- Supported individual and small groups of teachers
to further their professional development by attending
seminars, conferences, workshops. Eg. New England
Kindergarten Conference.
Math
- Provided two workshops on the language of
mathematics and MCAS preparation through Dr. Mahesh
Sharma.
- The Math Specialist held meetings with all
homeroom teachers during the year to train them in the
use of the math student profile.
Our
goals
for moving to the
next phase
are:
Literacy
- Plan the next level of SFA training during the
summer of 2000 along with the other SFA schools.
- Scale-up the training for veteran SFA teachers
while providing entry-level training to new teachers
(summer and year-long).
- Principal, SFA facilitator and selected teachers
to participate in national SFA conferences to further
develop supervision and coaching skills, and to learn
latest research-based developments in SFA to support
the implementation of SFA at the school.
- All teachers will receive raining in one LASW
protocol in the Fall of 2000.
- Train a cadre of four (4) teachers in grades K-3,
in the READ assessments this summer.
- Continue to build capacity within the building by
providing opportunities for groups of teachers to
attend professional development activities.
- The ILT will develop a comprehensive professional
development plan that addresses student learning based
on formative and summative assessment information.
Particular attention being paid to Level 1 students
and what they will need to succeed. Oct.-Nov.
2000
- Our content coach will train all teachers in the
setting and the writing of SMART goals by November
2000.
Math
- The Math Leadership Team will be trained in the
use of the TERC Investigations curriculum materials
and they will also be trained in the Developing
Mathematical Ideas program.
- Coaching will be provided to the MLT as they
implement the TERC materials in their classes.
- Dr. Sharma will be developing, with the MLT, a
math professional development plan for all other staff
members for the 2000-2001 school year.
The following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
Literacy
- Success for All component level meetings take
place every two weeks and teachers share effective
strategies.
- Meetings are hosted in different classrooms to
give teachers an opportunity to share the way they
have designed their physical environment that is so
critical to an effective SFA program. They also
highlight a particular practice that is working well
in the program.
- New SFA teachers make observations in classrooms
of more experienced teachers.
- "Imported" best practices from SFA Conferences and
the onsite sharing of best practices by the SFA
Implementation trainers enrich the teachers'
repertoire.
- The SFA Facilitator will model lessons or part of
lessons to share a best approach.
The following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
- The school uses an all funds approach to
supporting its teaching and learning agenda.
Allocation of funds is determined by need. Primary
sources of funds are BPS General Fund, Title I,
Transition Program Ch. 636, Cohort I and Reading
Excellence Grant.
- The school's academic focus will remain literacy
but we feel we are well along and can become a Math
Level II school, therefore, we seek to use some of the
Cohort I funds to support a math coach
- All students at the Agassiz benefit equally from
the current allocation of resources. Whenever a
discrepancy is noticed, we address it, as has been the
case with certain special needs cases.
- The school has a schedule that accommodates the
largest number of common planning times possible.
- Our Resource Room teachers (with one exception)
continue to teach SFA classes during the literacy
block.
- Paraprofessionals are engaged in one-to-one
tutoring for gr. 1 students on a daily basis.
- One BTU specialist (Geography)is teaching an SFA
class.
- Funds have been used to further the establishment
of classroom libraries, an initiative started by the
school department.
- Bilingual teachers are teaching SFA English
classes.
- No programs interfere the SFA literacy block.
Our
goals
for moving to the
next phase
are:
- Use of 18 hours for LASW-90 minutes per month.
Each Instructional Team will select a day and time
after school for their LASW time.
- Use SY'00 Cohort I roll-over funds from coaching
to support math coaching during SY'01.
- We are making literacy support plans based on the
notion that we need to count on the Reading Excellence
(READ) grant to provide the funds that might not exist
via Cohort I. An example is the funding of
professional development activities such as teachers
attending the SFA National conference(April
2001.)
- Use READ grant to fund the half-time Literacy
Specialist.
- The selection of areas that 5th P&D
specialists (contracted from outside BPS) will work on
will support our literacy needs. Example, substitute
dance instruction with creative writing
instruction.
- Perform a Resource Review as part of the IDR
process (October 2000).
The following
evidence
was used to determine this marking:
- Parents are fully informed, throughout the school
year, of students' academic and social expectations.
Teachers regularly send home newsletters detailing the
monthly activities in which the students will be
engaged. The principal also communicates with parents
letting them of upcoming events such as testing,
assemblies, awarding of grants, changes in staff,
etc.
- All communication from the office to parents is in
both Spanish and English.
- Teachers made frequent telephone calls to their
students' homes with both good and bad news.
- Success For All "star" post cards were sent to the
homes of children twice during the school year.
- Literacy workshops were held three times during
the year.
- Parents are encouraged to express their opinions
of the educational programs at the school and to seek
clarification of BPS policies that impact their
children.
- The school has one parent liaison through Cohort
I.
- A pair of teachers prepared a manual for incoming
Spanish bilingual kindergarten children and their
parents to address the need to develop language.
Training dates for the use of the manual have been
scheduled for early fall.
- Bilingual parents meet once a month in the school
with the Bilingual coordinator.
- The School Site Council still suffers from not
having the number of parents involved that it should
have.
- There is a parent representative on the ILT.
Our
goals
for moving to the
next phase
are:
- Develop a Parent-School Compact by October
2000.
- Establish a standing committee during the
2000-2001 school year to oversee the
parental/community involvement aspect of WSC by
October 2000.
- Work with the Title 1 Parent Resource Center to
implement outreach strategies that will give parents
an opportunity to participate in an on-going dialogue
and to receive training in literacy and math.
- Involve the CPC in supporting the reestablishment
of an active SPC.
- Increase number of literacy workshops and
implement math workshops.
- Make school information available, in both
languages, via the Internet by October 2000.
- Establish a business partnership by November
2000
-
Summary of our
Rankings in Implementing the Six
Essentials

|